Transcendental Argument
The transcendental method...does not try to prove that genuine knowledge is possible; rather, it presupposes that it is. Then it asks, What must the world, the mind and human thought be like if this presupposition is true? The transcendental method then goes ahead to ask what the necessary conditions of human knowledge are. The answer must first of all must be the existence of the God of Scripture. To Van Til, this principle was not only a fact, but an argument for the existence of God. Without God there is no meaning (truth, rationality, etc.); therefore, God, exists.
John Frame Apologetics to the Glory of God, pg. 70
Pages
By Scripture
Old Testament
Genesis
Exodus
Leviticus
Numbers
Deuteronomy
Joshua
Judges
Ruth
1 Samuel
2 Samuel
1 Kings
2 Kings
1 Chronicles
2 Chronicles
Ezra
Nehemiah
Esther
Job
Psalms
Proverbs
Ecclesiastes
Song of Solomon
Isaiah
Jeremiah
Lamentations
Ezekiel
Daniel
Hosea
Joel
Amos
Obadiah
Jonah
Micah
Nahum
Habakkuk
Zephaniah
Haggai
Zechariah
Malachi
New Testament
Matthew
Mark
Luke
John
Acts
Romans
1 Corinthians
2 Corinthians
Galatians
Ephesians
Philippians
Colossians
1 Thessalonians
2 Thessalonians
1 Timothy
2 Timothy
Titus
Philemon
Hebrews
James
1 Peter
2 Peter
1 John
2 John
3 John
Jude
Revelation
Latest Links
John Calvin
Jeremiah Burroughs
Derek Thomas
Monergism FAQs
Simon van Bruchem
Thomas R Schreiner
Christopher Ash
Collin Hansen
Paul Washer
Paul Washer
Paul Washer
Paul Washer
Paul Washer
Paul Washer
Paul Washer
Joel R Beeke
Peter Martyr Vermigli
Thomas R Schreiner
Greg Morse
Dan Cruver
R C Sproul
Stephen Kneale
Monergism Answers
Monergism Answers
Kim Riddlebarger
Bible Teacher
Costi Hinn
Kevin DeYoung
Dr Sinclair B Ferguson
R C Sproul
Barry Cooper
Louis Markos
David Mathis
Sarah Eekhoff Zylstra
Derek Rishmawy
Richard B Gaffin Jr
Carl Trueman
Ligonier Devotional
Jeremiah Knight