PART TWO: OUR MOTHER’S ORDAINED OFFICE

Chap. 5: Forsaking Our Mother: Why Ordained Men?

 

Burning Bush Experiences

Ever had a “burning bush” experience with God?  Recently, a kind woman told me of her vision from God.  She said that her vision was like a “burning bush” experience, and I think this was a reference to Moses.  I told her that visions should be checked these days because it seems that they are like opinions, everyone has one.  She laughed nervously when I told her this, but my point was that Christians today need to remember that even Moses in his burning bush experience had elders he submitted to in order for them to recognize his calling and vision from God.

 

If Moses was to have accountability in this way, then how much more should we who live in the time after the resurrection and ascension to Christ, where Christ has given in his resurrection-ascension the Church to his people (Eph. 4:11-16).  Let me remind us all of a few things about the call of God and ordination from the story of Moses before we begin our study on the ordained ministry in this chapter.

 

If you remember from Exodus 2, when Moses was older, he killed an Egyptian who was brutally beating a Hebrew (Exodus 2:11ff).  Now Moses seemed to understand that he was the perfect instrument for God to use in order to redeem from slavery God’s people (cf. Acts 7:22-27; Heb. 11:23ff).  However, Moses’ mistake was that although God was going to use him for this very purpose, he had not been formally called by God and ordained in the Church, or recognized as called by God by the visible people of God at the time.  In this murder of the Egyptian, Moses acted prematurely with regard to his calling.  He had not been formally called and ordained by God yet, neither had he been prepared and ordained for the service.

 

Many years later in Moses’ life, after 40 years of humility as the humble shepherd and son-in-law of Jethro the Midianite, Moses is formally called by God in the burning bush incident.  God (YHWH) reveals himself to Moses, calls him to the task, and even though Moses doubts his abilities, questions God’s purposes, and fears the worst outcome, God assures Moses that his power and presence will be “with him” and thus this will be Moses’ success (Exodus 3:10-12; 4:1-17).  What is important to note about this incident is that before Moses is to fulfill his now legitimate call from God, he is first to go to the elders of Israel (Exodus 3:16-18) and convince them of the mission.  Moses is not called to be a special “spiritual lone ranger” with a vision, rather he is instructed by God himself (even though God could have used different means) to be recognized by the elders first, then fulfill his mission.  God tells Moses in Exodus 3, after his supernatural vision and revelation of God’s Name:

 

ESV Exodus 3:16 Go and gather the elders of Israel together and say to them, 'The LORD, the God of your fathers, the God of Abraham, of Isaac, and of Jacob, has appeared to me, saying, "I have observed you and what has been done to you in Egypt, 17 and I promise that I will bring you up out of the affliction of Egypt to the land of the Canaanites, the Hittites, the Amorites, the Perizzites, the Hivites, and the Jebusites, a land flowing with milk and honey."' 18 And they will listen to your voice, and you and the elders of Israel shall go to the king of Egypt and say to him, 'The LORD, the God of the Hebrews, has met with us; and now, please let us go a three days' journey into the wilderness, that we may sacrifice to the LORD our God.' [emphasis mine].

 

This instructs us that even from the first time in redemptive-history, in a foundational period where God is now formally forming his visible people, God called men and then made that call legitimate through the recognition of elders and the people of God in the Church (cf. Acts 7:38 where Stephen speaking of the Old Testament people, uses the Greek word ‘Ecclesia’ or ‘Church’ to describe Israel; also note Hebrews 3:1-6; 1 Peter 2:5-10).  From the very beginning of God’s visible people, or Church, there have been special men called by God to serve God and lead God’s people, but always being recognized by God’s people as well.  Men are called by God, then recognized, or ordained by the visible Church.  If this is true for Moses, how much more is it important to realize this in our day as well.

 

Ordination to a Special Office

What is ordination?  It comes form a Latin word ‘ordinatio’ and has to do with order.  As 1 Corinthians 14:33 and 40 speak of all things in the Church being done “decently and in order”, this gets at what ordination is about:

 

1 Corinthians 14:33, 40: For God is not a God of confusion but of peace….But all things should be done decently and in order.

 

Part of the “order” being spoken of here is the place of each Christian within the visible Church (cf. Romans 12; 1 Corinthians 12).  God has placed certain men in places of leadership as his shepherds. As in the creation, there is order between man and woman; they are both equal as image-bearers of God, but in an orderly manner, God assigns the man to be shepherd of his wife, and assigns the woman to be a helper who is submissive and supportive of her husband (this is for another book, but all Christians today need to remember to repent of our foolishness: Men: we often do not lead as we should; women: you often do not supportively submit; this is for another book and another day, but we should remember that this too helps the order in the visible Church as we submit to one another in love for Christ, Eph. 5:21-32).

 

As in creation, God has ordered his Church in a particular way. Notice how the Apostle Paul stresses this order in 1 Corinthians 12:4-13.  The Apostle Paul teaches us that all Christians are equal by virtue of the one Spirit of God, but not all Christians have the same gifts, calling, or position in the visible Church:

 

Now there are varieties of gifts, but the same Spirit; 5 and there are varieties of service, but the same Lord; 6 and there are varieties of activities, but it is the same God who empowers them all in everyone. 7 To each is given the manifestation of the Spirit for the common good. 8 To one is given through the Spirit the utterance of wisdom, and to another the utterance of knowledge according to the same Spirit, 9 to another faith by the same Spirit, to another gifts of healing by the one Spirit, 10 to another the working of miracles, to another prophecy, to another the ability to distinguish between spirits, to another various kinds of tongues, to another the interpretation of tongues. 11 All these are empowered by one and the same Spirit, who apportions to each one individually as he wills. 12 For just as the body is one and has many members, and all the members of the body, though many, are one body, so it is with Christ. 13 For in one Spirit we were all baptized into one body- Jews or Greeks, slaves or free- and all were made to drink of one Spirit. (1 Corinthians 12:4-13).

 

What this passage teaches very plainly is the unity of Christ’s visible body of believers in the Church, that they all have the same Spirit of God uniting them to Jesus Christ (v. 5), and that they are all gifted by God (vv. 5-11).  Yet God has given certain positions, or has created order within the one visible Church.  There are varieties of service and from this passage as well as other passages in Scripture, we are told that some are called to pastor the saints and their gifts as elders (1 Peter 5:1-4).  All of these pastor-elders are submitted to each other and under Christ (1 Peter 5:1-2).  Peter says:

 

ESV 1 Peter 2:25 For you were straying like sheep, but have now returned to the Shepherd and Overseer of your souls.

 

Jesus Christ is the Great Shepherd and Overseer of the souls of God’s people, but he has ordered that the Church would have “undershepherds” who are his gifts in the Church (Eph. 4:11-16) so that the saints might be equipped for service.  Do you see the word “overseer” in the passage above? The Apostle Peter uses this Greek word ‘episcopos’, which is translated “bishop” or “overseer” in the above passage.  Elsewhere, Paul uses this same term in his first letter to Timothy where he states the biblical qualifications for bishops, or translated “overseers”, or elders (see also Titus 1:7).  Were there bishops who were greater or more important in status than mere elders and pastors? I think another look at 1 Peter 5 will help us answer this question.

 

In 1 Peter 5:1-4, Paul uses the terms ‘episcopos’ (bishop) and ‘presbuteros’ (pastor-elder) interchangeably:

 

ESV 1 Peter 5:1 So I exhort the elders among you, as a fellow elder and a witness of the sufferings of Christ, as well as a partaker in the glory that is going to be revealed: 2 shepherd the flock of God that is among you, exercising oversight, not under compulsion, but willingly, as God would have you; not for shameful gain, but eagerly; 3 not domineering over those in your charge, but being examples to the flock. 4 And when the chief Shepherd appears, you will receive the unfading crown of glory. [emphasis mine].

 

From the Greek text, Peter literally says in verse one above (and this is stated this way from the Greek for emphasis): “Elders, I exhort the elders among you, as a fellow-elder…”  Peter then goes on to explain the privilege of this office of elder which includes shepherding, “exercising oversight”, and being examples (vv. 2-3, the word for “oversight” is ‘episcopos’ or “bishoping”).  As much as Rome might claim that bishops and elders are different offices, Peter says that they are the same.  He calls the elders or ‘presbuteroi’ to the task of performing as ‘episcopoi’ or “bishops” by “exercising oversight.  The Apostle Paul also speaks of the elder ‘presbuteros’ and the bishop ‘episcopos’ interchangeably as the same office in his first letter to Timothy (1 Timothy 3:1-2; cf. 5:17).  He will also make a distinction within the one office of elder between those who rule and those who teach the Word of God:

 

ESV 1 Timothy 5:17 Let the elders who rule well be considered worthy of double honor, especially those who labor in preaching and teaching.

 

The Apostolic office Peter held as one called specifically by Jesus Christ, and confirmed in his faithfulness by those who walked and learned from Jesus, was a very special and unique office of Christ’s Church; it was foundational for all other offices (Acts 2:41-44; Eph. 2:20).  Built upon that special and unique foundational office was the office of elder-pastor (or bishop, or elder). 

 

For the remainder of our study based on this simple exegesis, I will use pastor-elder as one office that is an office within the Church of Christ that is built upon the teaching of the apostles and prophets with Jesus Christ being the chief Cornerstone (Eph. 2:20; 4:4-13), and the elder-pastor is called to shepherd or to oversee the discipling and teaching of Christ’s people.  All authority as shepherds of the Church called by God comes from the Great Shepherd himself, but men who are called by God to be pastor-elders, should be ordained and accountable to other men called by God and ordained, both in the study and interpreting of the Bible so that they can faithfully continue to proclaim the good teaching of Christ’s truth.  This is their call, their privilege and their sacred duty as “overseers” of Christ’s flock.

 

Yet in our day there is a misunderstanding and lack of appreciation of this special office of pastor-elder.  I have realized in my conversations with Evangelical, Bible-believing Christians that is due primarily to a low view of Christ’s visible Church.  Part of the problem has to do with the reality that sinful men have abused and misused the office of pastor-elder, and so this gives people the legitimate concern to be “once bitten, twice shy” as the old saying goes. 

 

Just as positions of male headship in the home or female positions in society have been abused, it does not mean that we should discount the office of pastor-teacher as something unnecessary, any more than we would discount being a husband or wife because the marriage relationship has been abused and misused.  It is worth saying again that the abuse of a thing should not cause us entirely to discount an office God has ordained and Christ has given to his people in order that they might learn and grow in the Word of God.

 

Since the beginning of Redemptive-history, when God was formally forming his Church, or his visible people as told to us in the Book of Exodus, there have been pastor-elders over Christ’s people.  From Moses and the elders of Israel, to the prophets, all the way to Jesus Christ himself, there has been the call of God and the recognition from the people of God that pastor-elders were indispensable to the Church.  Even Jesus Christ, although unique as the Great Prophet, Priest, and King was sent from God (John 5:25-39), and received a call (albeit a very special one) at God’s right hand before he became man.  The author to the Book of Hebrews gives us some of the details:

 

ESV Hebrews 2:10 For it was fitting that he, for whom and by whom all things exist, in bringing many sons to glory, should make the founder of their salvation perfect through suffering. 11 For he who sanctifies and those who are sanctified all have one origin. That is why he is not ashamed to call them brothers, 12 saying, "I will tell of your name to my brothers; in the midst of the congregation I will sing your praise." 13 And again, "I will put my trust in him." And again, "Behold, I and the children God has given me." 14 Since therefore the children share in flesh and blood, he himself likewise partook of the same things, that through death he might destroy the one who has the power of death, that is, the devil, 15 and deliver all those who through fear of death were subject to lifelong slavery.

 

The psalms quoted above in Hebrews 2 are supposed to be Jesus Christ speaking and saying “Here I am” as an answer to the call of His Father to be a Savior of sinners who shares in flesh and blood and destroys the power of death, hell and the devil, to deliver his people from bondage to sin and misery.  Even though Jesus Christ was called before the foundation of the world to accomplish his task as Savior-Mediator in history, nevertheless, God sent John the Baptist to prepare the way for him giving legitimacy to who he was as the Lord in the flesh (Matt. 3:1-12; Isaiah 40:1ff).  Jesus tells the people plainly that if John was not a good enough witness to his calling from God, then the miracles should be.  The Apostle John records Jesus’ words for us concerning the fact that even Jesus had legitimate recognition by the people of God:

 

ESV John 5:31-39: If I alone bear witness about myself, my testimony is not deemed true. 32 There is another who bears witness about me, and I know that the testimony that he bears about me is true. 33 You sent to John, and he has borne witness to the truth. 34 Not that the testimony that I receive is from man, but I say these things so that you may be saved. 35 He was a burning and shining lamp, and you were willing to rejoice for a while in his light. 36 But the testimony that I have is greater than that of John. For the works that the Father has given me to accomplish, the very works that I am doing, bear witness about me that the Father has sent me. 37 And the Father who sent me has himself borne witness about me. His voice you have never heard, his form you have never seen, 38 and you do not have his word abiding in you, for you do not believe the one whom he has sent. 39 You search the Scriptures because you think that in them you have eternal life; and it is they that bear witness about me....

 

The point to be made is that every call of God here on earth, including Moses and Christ, had the recognition of the people of God, giving a witness-legitimacy to their callings: Moses had the elders, and Jesus had John the Baptist and the signs and wonders, and the very voice of God himself that pointed to his being sent by the Father.  Jesus Christ even had Moses and the Scriptures that witnessed to his special office as well (Luke 24:24-27, 44-49; cf. John 5:39).  But he did not have a call from God without recognition from the visible Church here on earth and this should be appreciated by all Evangelical, Bible-believing Christians today.  We will discuss this more in detail later.

 

“You Don’t Need Anyone to Teach You.”

The teaching above seems clear that there is a special call from God that is recognized by Christ’s people.  It also seems clear that there are to be pastor-elders over every congregation of saints.  However, some scriptures seem to teach otherwise.  There are some scriptures that seem to indicate that because we have the Holy Spirit, we no longer need pastor-elders and teachers.  In fact, as a pastor, some Christians have come to me and asked me the legitimate question concerning Christ’s visible Church:

 

“If Christ has given His Spirit and His Word to men, and the Holy Spirit is the one who interprets and helps us to understand that Word spoken, then what need does God have of men in a special office such as pastors and elders”? (1 Cor. 2:6-14).

 

I want you to understand that those asking this question are not merely immature Christians who are new to the faith, but those who have always assumed that there were to be pastor-elders and teachers in Christ’s Church, but are questioning it now due to a popular understanding of certain texts by evangelicals.

 

Particularly in light of the Apostle John’s teaching in 1 John 2:20-28, why does anyone need anyone but the Holy Spirit to help in teaching and discernment:

 

But you have been anointed by the Holy One, and you all have knowledge. 21 I write to you, not because you do not know the truth, but because you know it, and because no lie is of the truth. 22 Who is the liar but he who denies that Jesus is the Christ? This is the antichrist, he who denies the Father and the Son. 23 No one who denies the Son has the Father. Whoever confesses the Son has the Father also. 24 Let what you heard from the beginning abide in you. If what you heard from the beginning abides in you, then you too will abide in the Son and in the Father. 25 And this is the promise that he made to us- eternal life. 26 I write these things to you about those who are trying to deceive you. 27 But the anointing that you received from him abides in you, and you have no need that anyone should teach you. But as his anointing teaches you about everything- and is true and is no lie, just as it has taught you- abide in him. 28 And now, little children, abide in him, so that when he appears we may have confidence and not shrink from him in shame at his coming. 29 If you know that he is righteous, you may be sure that everyone who practices righteousness has been born of him.” (1 John 2:20-29). [emphasis mine].

 

John seems to be saying here that we have the right merely as individuals to read and study the Word of God, avoid error and heresy, because “the anointing teaches you,” so that you have no need “that anyone should teach you.”  What we want to first notice is that this is written by the Apostle John in the ordained office of Apostle.  When some say this is a text for private judgment apart from the Church and try to show that there really is no need for the ordained office of pastors and teachers, they mistakenly misinterpret this passage. In fact, the text teaches the exact opposite.

 

Not only is John as teaching apostle telling them about the anointing and the help of the Holy Spirit, he is telling them specifically that they do not need any unauthorized or false teachers teaching them.  The point is that this congregation of Christians was being taught or influenced by some who did not carry apostolic sanction, authority or the Word of God, and they were teaching something additional to that word claiming it was by the Spirit (cf. Galatians 1:1-11).  In other words, they claimed to be called by God, but had no recognition from the other apostles and elders in the Church.

 

This reality is why John starts by saying to the congregation he is addressing that “you have knowledge and know the truth” (vv. 20-21). Without getting in too deep with this passage, just allow me to say that John was confronting teachers who were threatening the congregation of saints, and telling them that there was a special “secret truth” (Gnosticism) that could be had.  John is countering them by saying: “You have been taught apostolic truth, there is no other truth”.  Furthermore, he is saying that these are unauthorized teachers prove themselves to be false because they disagree with apostolic teaching (“apostolicity”), and are not recognized in their call by other apostles and elders.

 

As we learned in an earlier chapter, we should never separate or divorce the Church from the Word of God.  Additionally, we should learn from this passage never to separate or divorce the Holy Spirit and His Anointing from the Word of God and the interpretation of the Word of God within Christ’s Church by called and ordained pastor-elders either.  What I mean is that it is the Anointing John is speaking of above by the Holy Spirit that leads the people of God into all truth, which is the Word of God that John and the pastor-elders of the Church had taught the people at the congregation he is addressing.

 

The Apostle John is not saying here that we do not need teachers altogether (he was an ordained teacher by Christ himself who is teaching!).  Rather, he is saying that Christians do not need teachers who do not have ordained authority to teach the Word of God.  So, this text teaches the precise opposite of what individualists within the Church today would have it teach.  This text in John shows the importance of ministers always teaching what the Spirit has taught in the Word, not in a privatistic, and individualistic sense, but with what the Church in her ordained ministry has always and consistently taught with regard to God’s Word.  In other words, interpretation should be in community with ordained ministers both living and dead as we will look at in more detail as we proceed in our study.

 

”They Were Not Of Us”

Let us put into practice something I have been stressing all along: the importance of interpreting the Bible together with all the saints.  Now how would you know if your pastor preached next week on 1 John 2:18-28, and he said that this meant that because the Church has the Holy Spirit the people of God do not need the ordained ministry because as we can see from the passage, there are false teachers out there (he would also be threatening his own job as well!)?  How would you know the correct interpretation of this passage, and how would you know if this was a teaching or an interpretation of this text in 1 John before you were born?  Well, by putting into practice the studying and interpreting of the Bible with saints both living and dead, we can find out very quickly that there were others long before the 21st century who misinterpreted this passage as well.

 

For example, in the Reformation of the Sixteenth century Calvin says in his commentary on John’s First Epistle, interpreting the passage against the interpretation of your “hypothetical pastor” above:

 

“Absurdly…do fanatical men lay hold on this passage, in order to exclude from the Church the use of outward ministry. He says that the faithful, taught by the Spirit, already understood what [the Apostle John] delivered to them, so that they had no need to learn things unknown to them. He said this, that he might add more authority to his doctrine, while everyone repeated in his heart an assent to it, engraven as it were the finger of God.” (Calvin, Comm. on the First Epistle of John).

 

My interpretation above on this passage and John Calvin’s is the same.  Did I remember Calvin’s interpretation when I sat down to exegete 1 John 2?  I did not remember exactly what he had said of the matter, but I looked it up to “check my own work” after I had interpreted the Bible with the help of the Holy Spirit.  This teaches us that the Holy Spirit has been helping Christ’s pastor-elders to be able to rightly interpret and handle the Word of God throughout all of church history (cf. 2 Tim. 2:15). 

 

Now it could be that both Calvin and me are wrong; it is possible.  But let’s continue to check our “interpretive work” which is another way of saying we are seeking as Paul taught Timothy to “rightly handle the Word of Truth”.  Before we look at another interpretation, let us remind ourselves of what John says in context before he teaches vv. 20-28, in 1 John 2:18-19, then we will return to evaluating our interpretation together with all the saints both dead and living:

 

ESV 1 John 2:18 Children, it is the last hour, and as you have heard that antichrist is coming, so now many antichrists have come. Therefore we know that it is the last hour. 19 They went out from us, but they were not of us; for if they had been of us, they would have continued with us. But they went out, that it might become plain that they all are not of us.

 

John tells us plainly that because it is the last hour (meaning the last time period after the resurrection-ascension of Jesus as the Church awaits his return), there are many antichrists.  He describes these as ‘those who went out from us’.  He goes on to say that if they had been “of us” they would have continued “with us”, but that in reality they were not “of us”.  In 1 John 2:19, the Apostle John lays out a clear principle: leaving or not continuing under the authority of pastor-elders in the visible Church is to become apostate and declare oneself “not of us”.  The context is important because now John goes on to explain that “You have knowledge and don’t need anyone to teach you” (v. 20).  What he means in the context is that the teachers who are unauthorized and teaching something other than the apostolic truth that they had been taught, are not legitimate pastor-elders and teachers, and it is just because they have gone “out from us”.  The going out from the visible Church revealed or showed to all that they were not legitimate called and ordained men in the Church.

 

Let us check our “interpretive work” with others on this to make sure we are interpreting correctly.  In the early Church, a pastor-elder named Cyprian, commenting on 1 John 2:19 said concerning those who had left the visible Church because of current persecutions and the influence of false teacher named Novatian: “It is therefore plain that in every case where someone has clearly withdrawn from the love and unity of the Church that person is an adversary of the Lord and antichrist. Indeed the Lord makes this point in his gospel: ‘If he refuses to take notice even of the Church, let him be to you as a Gentile and tax collector’ (Matt. 18:17).  If those who refuse to take notice of the Church are to be regarded as Gentiles and tax collectors, there is obviously a far greater obligation to classify as Gentiles and tax collectors those who show themselves to be rebels and enemies by devising false altars, illegal priesthoods, sacrilegious sacrifices, and counterfeit titles.”[1]

 

But as Evangelical, Bible-believing Christians have we studied the past so that we are aware of these issues against the ordained ministry that have arisen in the past? If we have studied the past, do we think about how to better interpret our Bibles together with all the saints both dead and living, and to seek God’s grace in Christ through the Church and her ordained office of pastor-elder? In our day of individualism, and because of the unfortunate experiences of evangelical Christians who have seen the office of pastor or elder abused, there is still a common respect perhaps, but overall disregard for the office of minister.[2]  However, we must keep in mind that as any other legitimate and real organization on earth, so the Church of Christ exists as a real organization on earth.  Christ has given us our “Mother” where we truly can be nurtured and admonished by Christ spiritually, yet truly and really being present in His Word and Sacrament for His people.

 

As we learned from our last chapter, the Reformers of the Sixteenth century were legitimately called and ordained men who began the reform of the one Church from within.  They knew from the passage in 1 John 2:18-19 that to leave and go out “from” the Church was sinful separation and would make them out to be false teachers (“antichrists”, v. 18).  The Reformers wanted to use their positions as pastor-elders to lead the Church back to the gospel, not to leave the Church as some of the Radical Reformers did. 

 

Home Churches and House Churches

In our day, it would seem we also have Radical Reformers within the visible Church of Christ.  There are groups of Bible-believing Christians who are tragically no longer making themselves part of the one visible Church, submitted to pastor-elders, but are leaving to start home or house churches.  To meet in a home as a church with ordained pastor-elders is one thing; to meet as a home church without legitimate pastor-elders and teachers shepherding you, is another.  This is not to say that those who practice home churching or house churching are all proving themselves to be non-Christians, but the sad and sober reality is that they have identified themselves more with the world than with the visible Church.[3] 

 

What is the goal of those who home church today, and how can it help us to better understand the importance of the ordained ministry?  From one of the websites of home church people, who have taken it upon themselves to leave the visible Church, they answer the question in their section on “frequently asked questions”: “What is the difference between a home church and a traditional church?”  The answer is revealing:

 

“One of the main themes of the house church concept is that we don't "go TO church ... we ARE the church."  Something that traditional churches have done is made the meeting, the building, the structure itself  "the church" when, in fact, the Scriptures say that WE are the church.”

 

The main things that house churchers desire to achieve according to their “statements of purpose” are (1) Active participation by all within a priesthood of believers, (2) the freedom to be able to express whatever the Holy Spirit is trying to convey to the group, and (3) allowing Jesus to be King of His church - with no man (Pastor or Leader of any kind) mediating between the Lord and His body.”[4]

 

What this group fails to realize is that although they are members of the one Church if they are believers, Christ has not given them “freedom to be able to express whatever the Holy Spirit is trying to convey to them”.  On the contrary, Christ has established pastor-elders to teach his people and equip them for works of service so that the Body of Christ might be built up (Eph. 4:13ff).  Christ has not called his people to submission to himself as King of the Church “without a man, pastor or leader, mediating.”  In fact it is just the opposite: Christ has given the apostles, prophets, evangelists, and pastors and teachers to mediate through his Word.  Christ has established his Lordship and authority, and given it to men he has called to shepherd and care for His Church.  As you can probably see from this well-meaning statement of purpose, these Christians are attempting to separate or divorce the Word of God from the Church of God and the ordained office (more later in this chapter on this).

 

Another group of people who call themselves by the name of Christ and are part of what is called the “House Church”, claim the following:

 

"Yes, we are right now in the midst of the early days of a sovereign, very radical, move of God," says Nate Krupp, publisher of the book God's Simple Plan For His Church on his home church website, Radical Christianity. "We are seeing God do incredible things: people are leaving the institutional church by the thousands; they are tired of being an audience, instead of a body; they question increasingly all the money that goes into buildings; they are tired of being controlled and manipulated; they long to use their giftings to serve God and see 'the priesthood of all believers', instead of 'the clergy' and they long to see the Holy Spirit allowed to freely move instead of everything being controlled. God is sovereignly, in these days, raising up a massive, growing movement of people who are desiring to function like the early Christians in the Book of Acts. Believers are turning their backs on all the programs and returning to their first love, Jesus."[5]

 

It is true that the office of elder and pastor has been abused.  It is true that many visible congregations of Christ as institutions have over-exaggerated building plans and goals that focus more on the tangible successes of the world rather than on the clear and faithful teaching of the Word of God and the Sacraments.  But just because the visible Church has been abused, does not mean we are free to leave and try to arrogantly “start over” at home. 

 

The “Household of God”, or the true “Home or House Church” is Christ’s Bride, our Mother whom Christ has given to us in the institutional and visible Church. Our call is not to break or separate from her, but to seek reform from within.  In fact, the reference to “returning to Jesus their first love” is language that the resurrected-ascended Christ spoke to his visible Church at Ephesus (Revelation 2-3), and as we studied in earlier chapters the visible Church at Ephesus had pastor-elders who were shepherding and guiding them.  In other words, to seek our first love, Jesus Christ, is to seek him together with all the saints both dead and living, not separating the Word of God from the ordained ministry of the Church!

 

Is this individualism unique to the 21st century Church? Is this idea of home church or house church unique to our time? Has there ever been such a development or mindset like this before in church history? Do you really know? If you are part of these home or house churches, are you sure that what you are doing is right and biblically authorized?  The Reformer John Calvin addressed this same mindset a few thousand years ago, and he said that in every age, there have been those who separated from the visible Church of Christ individualistically and self-righteously to attempt to attain that which was ordained to be sought in the visible Church together with all the saints:

 

"But in every age the prophets and godly teachers have had a difficult struggle with the ungodly, who in their stubborness can never submit to the yoke of being taught by human word and ministry. This is like blotting out the face of God which shines upon us in teaching...More detestable than this attitude is that of the apostates who have a passion for splitting churches, in effect driving the sheep from their fold and casting them into the jaws of wolves. We must hold to what we have quoted from Paul--that the church is built up solely by outward preaching, and that the saints are held together by one bond only: that with common accord, through learning and advancement, they keep the church order established by God (Eph. 4:12)." (‘Institutes’, IV.1.v).

 

Calvin wrote: “Whoever, therefore, either is trying to abolish this order [that Christ has established in the visible Church] and this kind of government, or discounts it as not necessary, is striving for the undoing or rather the ruin and destruction of the church. For neither the light and the heat of the sun, nor food and drink, are so necessary to nourish and sustain the present life as the apostolic and pastoral office is necessary to preserve the church on earth." (‘Institutes’, IV.3.ii).

 

“Me and My Bible”

Let us understand that this individualism and separatism is not a new occurrence and this too would be realized if Christians today, evangelicals particularly would read and understand the history of their family in the Church!  This was also a popular notion in 19th century America.  In the 19th century there was a movement from the visible Church where men who were ministers denied the need to study what the Church had taught before they were born, and chose to study Scripture with their own private judgment.

 

A. B. Grosh, a confessing Universalist said: “In religious faith we have but one Father and one Master…and the Bible, the Bible, is our only acknowledged creed-book.” (We will discuss more in later the fallacy of “No Creed but Christ”).  Alexander Campbell, founder of the Disciples of Christ, and a man who much like the Home Church and House Church movement wanted to restore a “primitive New Testament Christianity”, said: “I have endeavored to read the scriptures as though no one had read them before me.”[6]  The separation and schism from the visible Church is not a new development, we see it in the Reformation with Calvin and the Radical Reformers, and we see this repeated in 19th century America.  There has always been a sinful supposition that the Church has become extinct at certain periods in history.[7]

 

The statement that Campbell makes above “I have endeavored to read the scripture as though no one had read them before me” is the kind of individualistic attitude that continues to grow like a cancer in many Evangelical, Bible-believing churches today.  What is misunderstood by making comments like this, is that no one can read the Bible as if no one has read it before.  When we read the Bible, we interpret the Bible whether we like it or not.  There is no neutrality in our interpretation, we have learned it from someone.  The Word of God should not be separated or divorced from the Church generally, and more particularly the ordained teaching ministry that Christ has given to his people.  The purpose of the Word of God is not to read it alone and endeavor to read it as though no one else had read it before us, but our striving toward unity and one-minded-ness as we seek to know the love of Christ together with all the saints (Eph. 3:18).

 

The two men above are not unique examples of individualism, but I would dare say that this perhaps the most popular way of thinking among many Evangelicals today.  In response to this thinking, we should remember that the Apostle Paul says in 1 Timothy 3:16 that the visible Church is the “…Household of God, the pillar of truth…”.  We should ask of ourselves the important question: “Why is the Church called the ‘pillar of truth”? 

 

God could very well come down and teach us by his own mouth the truths of Scripture. God himself could choose to interpret our Bibles for us, or he could choose angels to bring his message, but God in his sovereignty and his grace has chosen the lips of sinful men specially called to the task and ordained into the ordained office.  God calls pastor-elders who are not perfect, but who are called by God and recognized by His people to be their teachers.  Because the Church is the mother of all believers, God gives them pastor-elders to nurture and to teach them so that in our mother’s loving arms we might grow up to maturity under her guidance.  The one “Household of God” is kept theologically clean and the Word of God is preserved for each generation to be nurtured and admonished.  We must never try to separate or divorce the Word of God from the one household of God, the pillar of the truth that God in his wisdom and grace has established in the ordained ministry of the Church.

 

It is most important for all Christians to be reminded that the “Household of God” is a visible household with an office for administering Word, Sacraments, and discipline.  The only “House Church” is the visible Church itself, the “Household of God” which by definition has ordained ministers and elders overseeing the work, service, and priesthood of all believers.  If you think like the man Alexander Campbell above, I would ask you to reconsider the way you are thinking with regard to the Word of God and the Church of God

 

Christ has established both Word and Church, but we are not to try and rent asunder that which God has joined together by his grace and in his great wisdom.  If you are a teacher in Christ’s Church and you think like Alexander Campbell above, I would remind you that you are not learning the love of Christ together with all the saints both dead and living.  You may (hopefully!) be teaching the truth, but how do you know if you interpret the Bible “as if no one before you has ever read it”?  As teacher especially, we should seek to rightly handle the Word of Truth and this can only be done by studying the Word of God in the Church and with the Church, with saints both dead and living, trusting the Holy Spirit to guide us into all truth as He has done for many generations in our family before we were ever born.  The “me and my bible” mentality must be repented of as the people of God.  We are called to read and study our Bibles in the Church, our mother Christ has given to us.  In reality there is no such thing biblically as “me and my bible” except in the Church!

 

Our precious and loving Mother has been provided by God, and for all believers within this one household, God has given teachers and ministers of the Word.  Although the idea of apostolical succession was eventually perverted and distorted from its biblical implications, there has always been a unity of truth deposited in the Church, the “pillar of truth”, and there is one office for administering and teaching doctrine God has placed in her hands in order to preserve the truth.  We will consider in our next chapter how the Ascended Christ ministers to His Church on Earth.

 

Next Chapter:

Chap. 7: The Ascended Christ’s Ongoing Ministry on Earth

 

Copyright 2005 A Place for Truth. None of this material may be reproduced in any form without written permission from the author.