Transcendental Argument
The transcendental method...does not try to prove that genuine knowledge is possible; rather, it presupposes that it is. Then it asks, What must the world, the mind and human thought be like if this presupposition is true? The transcendental method then goes ahead to ask what the necessary conditions of human knowledge are. The answer must first of all must be the existence of the God of Scripture. To Van Til, this principle was not only a fact, but an argument for the existence of God. Without God there is no meaning (truth, rationality, etc.); therefore, God, exists.
John Frame Apologetics to the Glory of God, pg. 70
Video by Greg Bahnsen
Web Page by Greg Bahnsen
Web Page by Michael R Butler
PDF by James Anderson
PDF by Joshua Pillows
Web Page by Jason Lisle
Web Page by Jason Lisle
Web Page by Jason Lisle
Video by Arne Verster
Video by Joshua Pillows
Web Page by Dr. John Frame
Web Page by Greg Welty
Web Page by Michael R Butler
Web Page by Douglas Wilson
Web Page by Matt Slick
Web Page by Matt Slick
PDF by Charles Biggs
Web Page by Jacob Gabriel Hale
Web Page by Reformed Apologist
PDF by Reformed Apologist
PDF by James Anderson
Video by Jason Lisle
Video by Jason Lisle
Web Page by Steve Hays
Web Page by Matt Slick
Web Page by Matt Slick
Video by K. Scott Oliphint
Video by K. Scott Oliphint
Web Page by Ron DiGiacomo
Audio/MP3 by Ron DiGiacomo